Uddhav should realize that Balasaheb (earlier known as Bal Thackeray) became Balasaheb not merely in Maharashtra but across India only when he championed Hindutva (but not of RSS / BJP).
– Politics is not merely about legality but morality too. When two third plus MLAs led by Eknath Shinde have left Chief Minister and Shiv Sena (SHS) Chief Uddhav Thackeray then there is no point in the SHS to somehow try to save Udhav Govt especially in view of the intervention of Supreme Court in favor of Shinde group and likelihood (reported in media) of Shinde group merging with MNS led by Raj Thackeray (or some other party) which will solve the problem of disqualification (under anti-defection law) of Shinde led MLAs.
Presently Uddhav has certainly lost the battle (of saving his Maharashtra Govt) but he can win the war if he endeavors to make the SHS to form the Union Govt and (simultaneously / subsequently) governments in many States of India including in Maharashtra. This can easily be done by Uddhav if he takes the support of Shiv Sainiks from all across India and endeavors to make the SHS to work for achieving ‘Akhand Bharat’ (SAARC) with US-led global order, as mentioned below:-
(1)- One can’t understand the meaning of the ongoing crisis in the SHS without understanding the meaning of ‘brand Balasaheb’ which is much talked about. What is a brand in politics? If we use the terminology of Hinduism then any society has three 'Gunas' namely ‘Tamo Guna’ (related to Economy of the country), ‘Rajo Guna’ (related to ‘Rajya’ the State) and ‘Sato Guna’ (related to Religion). Any political party based on 'Tamo Guna' depends on family and remains confined to the Provinces / States (which has police force at its command) like major political parties in India which are more or less in power mainly in States namely Congress party of Nehru- Gandhi, Lalu Yadav’s party, Mulayam Simgh Yadava’s party, Sharad Pawar’s party, Badal’s party SAD, Naveen Patnaik's Party, YSR-Congress Party, Parties of Abdullahs & Muftis in J&K, DMK in Tamil Nadu etc. These ‘Tamo Guna’ based parties are meant to merely come in power and always need a family to even survive.
(2)- Whereas parties based on ‘Sato Guna’ / religion are ideological parties which may be started by someone (like Balasaheb Thackeray) but does not need their children to make it a success rather mostly such children become a hurdle in the success of such an ideological party as is happening with the SHS. These ‘Sato Guna' parties (based on religion and subsumes ‘Tamo Guna’ / economy also) not only flourish in States but at Center too (which has military power and controls States also through 130, 131 CrP.C. and article 121, 142 and 144 of the constitution through Supreme Court and even by Article 356 etc).
(3)- The ‘Tamo Guna’ (merely economy) based parties tend to wither away if there is no capable member of family (children etc) to takeover the party as is happening in BSP of Mayawati, in NCP of Sharad Pawar, AIADMK of Jailalita etc. Even Balasaheb & Uddhav Thackeray (who were not serious about running a ‘Sato Guna’ / religion based party and that too a ‘garam dal’) converted the SHS into a ‘Tamo Guna’ / merely economy based (family oriented) party hence Uddhav has lost face & power against onslaught of Eknath Shinde.
(4)- The ‘garam-dal’ (as SHS is) has one major problem, namely it invariably fails to understand that there is only one fundamental difference between a 'naram-dal' and ‘garam-dal’. The ‘garam-dal’ keeps the executive & judicial elements of the State under discipline of the laws and constitution of the country (and agitate and suffers for it even by offering arrest in order to protect the majesty of law) whereas generally the 'naram-dal' merely gives lip service to rule-of-law. The SHSB will succeed only when it realizes this basic nature and difference between ‘garam-dal’ and 'naram-dal'.
(5)- In India Balasaheb was the only politician which started a ‘Sato Guna’ / religion based political party because he had religio-political predilections (not merely because he wore 'Bhagwa' rob which Yogi Adityanath is also wearing but who doesn’t know even abcd of ideological politics). The BJP is controlled by the RSS and not by any religio-political leader hence it can’t be an ideological party in any future hence will wither away in due course of time, if it doesn't improve. The less said better about AIMIM led by Owaisi who even doesn’t say that it is based on Islam and merely says that it is for Muslims hence it is also a ‘Tamo Guna’ based party.
(6)- There is one huge difficulty with any ‘Sato Guna’ / ideological party. It expects unwavering integrity about the basic principle & policies of such a party from its members and especially from its office bearers. This was the main reason that even Balasaheb could not make ‘brand Balasaheb’ successful in his time due to four main mistakes as mentioned at https://www.pakistanchristianpost.com/exclusive-reports-details/222 .
This is the main reason that Uddhav Thackeray also has failed to make the ‘brand Balasaheb’ successful. The latest proof of Uddhav Thackeray’s mistake is about the above mentioned second mistake which the SHS committed even during Bala Saheb’s time which is about the tendency of Shiv Sainiks (on the instigation of its office bearers) to indulge in violence against people. On June 23 also the SHS leader (and MP) Sanjay Raut from Uddhav Thackeray’s camp gave a threat, publicly that - “[For the SHS MLAs (who have gone with Eknath Shinde to Guwahati Assam) it will be difficult to come to Maharashtra and move in Maharashtra]”. After this statement of Sanjay Raut and similar statements by other office bearers of the SHS the Uddhav supporter Shiv Sainiks not only started violence in Mumbai against Shinde supporters but this violence by Uddhav supporters started spreading in other parts of Maharashtra also.
(7)- In present circumstances in order order to win the war (after losing battle) Uddhav can make ‘brand Balasaheb’ successful if the SHS takes the support of the Shiv Sainiks from all over India and not merely from Maharashtra by making the party based on major policies and programs as mentioned in above PCP article 222 including and especially by declaring that - “[The regular organizational elections of the SHS will be carried out all over India and the elections of the candidates of the SHS (for Parliament, State Legislatures and Local bodies) will be financed by the party because the elected representatives generally work only for those who finance their elections]”.
(8)- The SHS will succeed mainly by realizing that the USA supported the UK in partitioning India in 1947 for containing USSR (by making Pakistan member of SEATO & CENTO) and now the USA would support India in realizing 'Akhand Bharat' by uniting said mini-SAARC (and even in realizing SAARC) in order to contain China during on-going cold war - II.
It is hoped Uddhav will make ‘brand Balasaheb’ successful through SHS which (with the support of party members from all across India) will work for ‘Akhand Bharat’ (FSD-SAARC) which in the present situation can easily be achieved by working in tandem with US-led global political order during on-going cold war - II.