When Mahatma Gandhi failed in making Sanatani-Hindutva succeed then how would Modi ? (ii)- Jain-Hindutva would be known from only those religious leaders of Jainism who understand that Jainism is State based religion (iii)- Modi should solve the problems of Hindus of Bangladesh as mentioned in my article PCP 4450 (iv)- What is the use of eliminating Article 370 & 35 -A and bringing CAA if Modi can’t bring at least 10 million Hindus (from Bangladesh and Kashmiri Pandits) in Kashmir valley.  

— Despite a call (https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/India/pm-modi-receives-call-from-bangladesh-chief-advisor-muhammad-yunus-assured-protection-of-hindus/vi-AA1oVvkp ) by Bangladesh Government’s Chief Advisor Mohd. Yunus to PM Modi the Hindus in Bangladesh are still being persecuted and it has triggered deep emotions among Hindus in India especially when there is a government in Delhi of BJP of Hindutva forces as discussed at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWtLgDX6r5U 

The Indian Constitution as per its article 25 considers Hindus as also comprising Bauddhs, Sikhs and Jains who follow religions (Buddhism, Sikhism and Jainism) born in India. Though other Hindus like PM Modi and his followers (than Bauddhs, Sikhs and Jains) nowadays like to be called Sanatanis and when Indians talk about Hindutva they normally mean Sanatani-Hindutva. This word Hindutva came into wider public discourse when the ideologic Guru of Hindutva forces Savarkar published his book ‘Hindutva’ in 1923. 

Savarkar propounded a two nation theory which was exploited by Jinnah and Muslim League and  to this theory even Gandhi, Nehru, Patel succumbed to hence India was partitioned in 1947 on the basis of religion. 

But this Hindutva was not practiced in India from 1923 rather before that Mahatma Gandhi [who used to sing “Raghupati Raghav Raja Ram” in prayer meetings and practiced Hindu religious rite of ‘vrat’ (fasting) as political tool ] started practicing HIndutva rather Sanatani Hindutva when he led the political programs & agitations of Congress party in colonial India by using the concepts of Santani Hinduism and that was the reason Muslim  leaders (including Jinnah) left Congress.

But Mahatma Gandhi failed in this experiment of Sanatani-Hindutva (which resulted not only in unfortunate trifurcation of the country but also in killing of about one million and forced displacement of about 15 million people during partition in the most ghory situation) because he practiced Sanatani-Hindutva and not the Jain-Hindutva.

Now PM Modi (who is associated with rather addicted to  Santani-Hindutva) should understand that only Jain-HIndutva has any chance of success in the matter of State (including politics) because Jainism is the State based religion.  

To be fair to Modi, even most of the religious leaders of Jainism don't understand this fact. In popular perception there are two religions based on non-violence namely Jainism and Buddhism  and people think that Jainism was started by Mahavir Swami and Buddhism was started by Gautam Buddh in about 6 th century B.C. OF course Buddhism was started by GATAM BUDDH Who was contemporary of Mahavir Swami but Jainism was started by its founder (its First Teerthankar) Rishabh Dev and not by Mahavir Swami WHO  was 24th prophet (Teerthankar) of Jainism. Which means that it is only Jainism which is the first and surviving non-violent religion of India / world  and which was started by a King (who understands the importance of State). Moreover one can practice non-violence only by giving monopoly of sanctioned physical coercion to the State ( therefore without State Jainism has no meaning). In other words Jain-Hindutva can be understood only by those who earn their bread & butter through non-violence with the help of the State [which is nothing but law, national and international therefore global order (source of international laws) is also necessary for Jainism]. 

I have raised my voice against any injustice to Muslims as is evident also from my article https://bangladeshchronicle.net/without-relying-on-the-us-muslims-cannot-get-justice-from-the-indian-state/ . But PM Modi should also know that there is a fundamental difference between the behavior of Hindus and Muslims regarding criminal matters. Muslims increased from 13% to 15 %  in population in India but Hidus decreased by 20% in both Pakistan and Bangladesh and from Muslim majority Kashmir hundreds of thousands of Kashmiri Pandits have been forced out by militant Jihadis. Therefore if PM Modi has any allegiance towards Hindutva then Modi government should bring at least 10 million Hindus from Bangladesh (who are presently suffering over there) and Displaced Kashmiri Pandits and establish them in Kashmir valley. If it is not done then what is the meaning of eliminating Article 370 & 35 -A and bringing the CAA on Statute. And thus once Kashmir valley becomes HIndu majority then the terrorism & other problems  in Kashmir will automatically come to an end. 

Moreover the Government of India (GoI) should  persuade / convince Sheikh Hasina, (the illegally removed Prime Minister of Bangladesh), to establish an office for her government-in-exile on Indian soil. It will help if the GoI can then contact the US establishment to constitute a Peace Keeping force (preferably approved by the Security Council of a global body) to: Bring peace and law & order to Bangladesh (Stage 1) and 2. Launch a new rule-based global organization (Stage 2) For which  more details in my article at: -

https://www.pakistanchristianpost.com/opinion-details/4450

Two more points are worth mentioning here:- (A)- Though the Biden - administration has denied the allegation of Sheikh Hasina that -”[the USA got removed her from power because she refused to give an island (St.Martin) to the USA for a military base]”. But it raises an important question: why does the USA need its military bases all across the world?  Rather the world body should have its military bases all across the world and not the USA to enforce the “Human Rights Friendly Rule Based Participatory Global Order” (HRFRBPGO). The military base of the USA all across the world is an unnecessary financial burden on the exchequer (on the people of the USA) and needs to be opposed vociferously and vehemently by the people of the USA including ASian Indian Americans (whome Hindutva forces led by PM Modi  can easily motivate) especially in this year 2024 of US-general elections. (B)-  India boasts that she is the leader of ‘Global South’. Hence if the USA doesn’t take the said interest in launching the new HRFRBPGO then India should take the lead in launching this new HRFRBPGO. The Global South initiative of India (https://www.mea.gov.in/press-releases.htm?dtl/38161/The_3rd_Voice_of_Global_South_Summit_2024 ) can make sense and can provide globally important position to India (which it richly deserves) only when India understands the importance of global order as explained below:- (i)- In this age of inevitable (due to unprecedented advancements of about 500 years  in technology & sciences including social science)  globalization the world can't do without "rule based participatory global order".(ii)- The veto based global order of the UN sponsored by the USA in 1945 has been destroyed through the UKraine war by Russia mainly with the help of another veto wielding country China. (iii)- THe most powerful secular democracy the USA doesn't seem to be interested in launching another global order ("rule based participatory global order") in place of the UN, hence the largest secular democracy India can take the lead in launching this new global order by first making the countries of this Global South as the founding members of this new global order in the first stage and then in second stage the countries of Global North can also join this new global order.(iv)-Of-course it will not be an easy task for India because China is also part of Global South and due its economic power will have considerable influence on the countries of Global South and which may not be to the liking of India moreover China may create hurdles in the path of launching this new global order with the initiative of India.(v)- But still India (which has been practicing secular democracy since independence for the last about 75 years and that too in this part of the world where no other country has such a record) can succeed in launching this new global order if musters "political will" to establish it. It will help if India can muster the consent (if not association) of the USA for launching this new global order if India conducts its diplomacy with the USA intelligently (and not foolishly as it did regarding Bangladesh where it helped Chinese supported Bangladesh Army Chief in removing Sheikh Hasina physically from Bangladesh).

It is hoped PM Modi would revive his allegiance to true Hindutva by giving-up addiction to  Sanatani-Hindutva and by working for Jain-Hindutva as mentioned above