We want at least the beginning of Rohingya repatriation. By Nandita Roy

Image

Bangladesh has considered repatriation as the most effective way to solve the Rohingya problem since the beginning and has continued all efforts accordingly since 2017. Recently, 24 Rohingyas from 4 families have agreed to return to Myanmar as a significant progress in the repatriation process after the river has receded and 24 Rohingyas have already been brought from Bhasanchar to the Kutupalong repatriation site to complete the process properly. It is important for Bangladesh to start the repatriation process once and once it starts, maybe it can be accelerated. Later, necessary pressure can be applied to Myanmar in this regard. If necessary, international organizations and forces can be involved. But according to the news published in the newspaper, UNHCR or the United Nations Refugee Agency has stopped giving food and drink to 24 Rohingya from 4 families who agreed to repatriate. After these news are widely spread in different newspapers, the question is coming to the fore, whether UNHCR is obstructing the repatriation process or not facilitating the repatriation process or whether they can do it! In one such situation, the Bangladesh government summoned the Bangladesh country head of UNHCR and sought their explanation in this regard. The Government of Bangladesh made it clear that UNHCR should work within their mandate. Bangladesh's main priority is Rohingya repatriation, said an official who was quoted in the newspaper on condition of anonymity. Because more than 1 million Rohingyas have been staying here for 6 years. We are trying to send a small group under the pilot project. We want everyone involved in this work, including international organizations, to help in this.

The Rohingyas will be repatriated based on their consent but the government does not want those who want to go, to be advised or influenced otherwise. We called the Bangladesh head of the UN Refugee Agency to remind him of his mandate and to act according to the agreement. It should be noted here that on August 25, 2017, when the Rohingyas poured into Bangladesh and about 750,000 Rohingyas took shelter in Bangladesh, an agreement was signed with the United Nations Refugee Agency with the Bangladesh government. According to that agreement, the UN refugee agency is responsible for taking care of the Rohingya as well as seeing if they want to return to Myanmar voluntarily. But it is not within the UN refugee agency's mandate to influence the decision of any Rohingya to return to Myanmar or to discourage them from returning to Myanmar. Bangladesh government has reminded them of this.

I think this incident will send a big message to many international and national non-governmental aid organizations working in Rohingya camps in Ukhia and Teknaf. Because there are allegations of anti-repatriation activities against many international aid organizations and many domestic private aid organizations that have been working in Rohingya camps for a long time. Those of us who work at the field level, we also witness some of these incidents. Especially when the first round of repatriation was initiated on November 15, 2018 and the second round of repatriation on August 22, 2019, many foreign and domestic NGOs are alleged to have conducted anti-repatriation campaigns among the Rohingya. Not a single Rohingya then agreed to return to Myanmar. As a result, the first and second round of Rohingya repatriation process failed. Then 2020 and 2021 passed due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Meanwhile, when the National League for Democracy, or NLD, led by Aung San Suu Kyi, who won the parliamentary elections in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, took power in a bloodless military coup, the repatriation process became uncertain. After burning a lot of wood, the process of repatriation started again with the mediation of China. First, a Myanmar delegation came to Bangladesh. Talked to about 480 Rohingya in Rohingya camps. Answers their various questions. As the Rohingyas could not trust word of mouth, a delegation of 22 members from Bangladesh visited Rakhine. Where they will be taken, where they will be kept, whether they will be given security for their lives, whether the houses and land they left in Rakhine will be returned, etc. They have seen and come to know. After returning from Rakhine, some Rohingya objected to return there. Their interpretation is that they will be taken back to Rakhine and housed in newly constructed camps; They will not be taken back to their abandoned homes. But some Rohingya have agreed to return to Myanmar, as they have been told they will stay in transit camps in Rakhine for the time being and be sent to their addresses later. Some people are confident in these words and some are not able to trust and that is very normal. But my point is that we should all have a positive attitude and a cooperative attitude towards repatriating those who have voluntarily agreed to go and whom Myanmar has agreed to take. It is important to have a strict government policy if there is an obstacle. So, calling the head of the UN refugee agency to warn is a warning for everyone.

Finally, here is a big  issue for Bangladesh, Bangladesh has sheltered about 11 lakh Rohingyas in 34 temporary camps for the last six years and faced many problems and crises, but not a single Rohingya has been forcibly sent back to Myanmar. Such behavior of the United Nations Refugee Agency (not providing food to 24 members of 4 Rohingya families!) on the eve of the implementation of a pilot project to start repatriation through various bilateral and multilateral negotiations under all international regulations is not acceptable (although they have denied it). Although there are different international geopolitical calculations of this China-mediated repatriation process and different grammars of regional hegemony (which will be discussed in another article), we want at least the beginning of Rohingya repatriation. Wishing the Rohingyas a voluntary, dignified and safe repatriation.

You May Also Like

Image

In October Egyptians celebrate Sadat’s 1973 Sinai victory and recall his assassination.By Dr. Ashraf Ramelah

Anwar El Sadat, the third president of Egypt’s republic, was assassinated during the eighth annual celebration parade for Egypt’s victo

Image

This October is the fourteenth anniversary of the end of the Mubarak era. What kind of president was he for Egypt? By Dr. Ashraf Ramelah

Mohammed Hosni Mubarak’s stellar military career in aviation ended in 1975 when President Sadat appointed him as his vice president. Upon Sad

Image

Bold steps needed to boost BD's garment sector. By Ibrahim Khalil Ahasan

BGMEA had demanded massive production disruption due to recent labor unrest. Apart from this, there have been various incidents including factory c

"Trial of Pakistani Christian Nation" By Nazir S Bhatti

On demand of our readers, I have decided to release E-Book version of "Trial of Pakistani Christian Nation" on website of PCP which can also be viewed on website of Pakistan Christian Congress www.pakistanchristiancongress.org . You can read chapter wise by clicking tab on left handside of PDF format of E-Book.

nazirbhattipcc@aol.com , pakistanchristianpost@yahoo.com